Lowe v BEA Systems Pty Ltd (extempore) [2005] NSWIRComm 112
The court, having considered the principles of efficient administration of justice and noting the absence of an automatic stay pending appellate proceedings, held that the respondent's application to defer the proceedings should be dismissed and the matter should proceed to the determination of the applicant's notice of motion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Judgment on Adjournment Application
- Outcome
- respondents' notice of motion to defer proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment Application' 'procedural Fairness' 'supervisory Jurisdiction' 'stay of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Judgment on Adjournment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be deferred pending determination of a summons in the NSW Court of Appeal seeking prohibition against this court from hearing the applicant's notice of motion to amend the proceedings" 'Whether the application to the Court of Appeal operates as a stay of these proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The court, having considered the principles of efficient administration of justice and noting the absence of an automatic stay pending appellate proceedings, held that the respondent's application to defer the proceedings should be dismissed and the matter should proceed to the determination of the applicant's notice of motion.
Court Disposition
respondents' notice of motion to defer proceedings dismissed
Orders
- ['The notice of motion filed by the respondents is dismissed.' 'Costs to be dealt with at the conclusion of the proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment