Broome v Citibuilt Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 360
Having regard to the protective function under s 76, the tutor's support, the medical and other material, counsel's confidential advice, and the risks and possible quantum at a full hearing, the Court was satisfied that the proposed settlement was in the plaintiff's best interests and should be approved.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Approval of Settlement of Personal Injury Proceedings Commenced on Behalf of a Person Under Legal Capacity / Settlement Approval Under S 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw); Orders Made by Consent
- Outcome
- Orders made by consent approving the proposed settlement.
- Legal Topics
- ['approval of Settlement' 'person Under Legal Incapacity' 'protective Function of the Court' 'damages Settlement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Approval of Settlement of Personal Injury Proceedings Commenced on Behalf of a Person Under Legal Capacity / Settlement Approval Under S 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw); Orders Made by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed settlement of proceedings commenced on behalf of the plaintiff by his tutor should be approved under s 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).' 'Whether the proposed settlement was in the best interests of the plaintiff, including having regard to the possibility that a full hearing might produce a greater award of damages.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the protective function under s 76, the tutor's support, the medical and other material, counsel's confidential advice, and the risks and possible quantum at a full hearing, the Court was satisfied that the proposed settlement was in the plaintiff's best interests and should be approved.
Court Disposition
Orders made by consent approving the proposed settlement.
Orders
- ['Orders made in terms of draft consent orders (1) to (4) inclusive.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment