Campbell v DDB Needham Melbourne Pty Ltd [1994] IRCA 48
It is not appropriate for jurisdictional matters such as alleged date and nature of termination to be determined before referral to conciliation as mandated by the Act; the matter is ordered to be referred to the Commission for conciliation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 S170 EA / Preliminary Directions and Motion Hearings; Order for Referral to Conciliation
- Outcome
- Order for referral to conciliation; directions and motions adjourned; costs reserved
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Termination' 'jurisdictional Preliminaries' 'conciliation Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 S170 EA / Preliminary Directions and Motion Hearings; Order for Referral to Conciliation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether employment was terminated by employer or by resignation' 'Whether termination occurred before the commencement date of Industrial Relations Act 1988' 'Whether Court can determine jurisdictional issue before referral to Commission for conciliation']
Ratio Decidendi
It is not appropriate for jurisdictional matters such as alleged date and nature of termination to be determined before referral to conciliation as mandated by the Act; the matter is ordered to be referred to the Commission for conciliation.
Court Disposition
Order for referral to conciliation; directions and motions adjourned; costs reserved
Orders
- ['The matter be referred to the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission for conciliation' 'Commission requested to expedite conciliation' 'Directions hearing and motions adjourned to 12 October 1994' 'Costs reserved']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment