David DeBattista v Shoalhaven City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1602
The amended application addresses expert recommendations and complies with relevant planning controls, including height and density. Expert evidence supports conditional approval. Community objections are not supported by objective evidence and do not justify refusal. Development consent is granted subject to agreed conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: David DeBattista; Respondent: Shoalhaven City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Final Hearing and Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Residential Flat Building, Amenity Impacts, Height and Density Controls, Community Objections
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David DeBattista
Applicant
Shoalhaven City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Final Hearing and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted for a four-storey residential flat building of 54 units at St Georges Basin
- 2 Whether the amended plans address concerns of excessive height, density, and amenity impacts
- 3 Weight to be given to objectors' evidence versus expert evidence supporting conditional approval
Ratio Decidendi
The amended application addresses expert recommendations and complies with relevant planning controls, including height and density. Expert evidence supports conditional approval. Community objections are not supported by objective evidence and do not justify refusal. Development consent is granted subject to agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted.
Orders
- Appeal upheld.
- Development consent granted to DA 16/183 for construction of a four-storey residential flat building of 54 units over two basement parking levels and associated strata subdivision at Lot 6 DP 1082382, Anson Street, St Georges Basin, in accordance with Exhibit B and subject to conditions in Exhibit 6.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment