Tompkins v Fonseka [2024] NSWCATAP 262
The appeal was dismissed because the orders made by the Tribunal were within the scope of the application and supporting documents, the Appellant was not denied procedural fairness, the application was not vexatious or misconceived, and there was no demonstrated miscarriage of justice. The quantum payable by the Appellant was amended to reflect the latest quotation, specifying $790 payable.
- Parties
- Appellant: David Edmund John Tompkins; First Respondent: Jude Fonseka; Second Respondent: Roshanie Fonseka
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision of Appeal Panel
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with modification to order as to quantum and lifting of stay.
- Legal Topics
- Dividing Fences, Appeal Procedures, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Edmund John Tompkins
Appellant
Jude Fonseka
First Respondent
Roshanie Fonseka
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision of Appeal Panel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the orders made by the Tribunal at first instance were consistent with the application and evidence before it
- 2 Whether the Appellant suffered procedural unfairness
- 3 Whether the application was vexatious
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the orders made by the Tribunal were within the scope of the application and supporting documents, the Appellant was not denied procedural fairness, the application was not vexatious or misconceived, and there was no demonstrated miscarriage of justice. The quantum payable by the Appellant was amended to reflect the latest quotation, specifying $790 payable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with modification to order as to quantum and lifting of stay.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed except for the purposes of order 2.
- Order 2 made in proceedings 2024/00031420 on 26 August 2024 is set aside. In its place, the Appeal Panel orders the Appellant to pay the Respondents $790 within seven days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment