Finlay v Roads and Maritime Services [2013] NSWADT 238

Clause 1.2(b) is not a term of the conciliation agreement obliging RMS to act; even if it were a term, RMS has not failed to comply as no final decision has been made regarding the applicant's position.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 08 October 2013
Procedural Posture: Application for Registration of Conciliation Agreement / Decision
Outcome: Application refused
Legal Topics: ['registration of Conciliation Agreement' 'deed of Release' 'compliance With Agreement Terms']

['anti Discrimination'] ['registration of Conciliation Agreement' 'deed of Release' 'compliance With Agreement Terms']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Registration of Conciliation Agreement / Decision

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether clause 1.2(b) is a term of the conciliation agreement' 'Whether RMS failed to comply with the term']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

["The applicant's application for the Tribunal to register a term of the conciliation agreement is refused."]

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.