R v Forbes (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 439
Given the mobile phone footage, which was not made available to the prosecution before proceedings, demonstrated an essential element of the offence could not be proved, it would not have been reasonable to institute proceedings had all facts been known. The applicant's withholding of this evidence was reasonable for tactical reasons.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Costs Certificate Following Acquittal
- Outcome
- Application for a certificate under section 2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in Criminal Cases' 'acquittal' 'reasonableness of Institution of Proceedings' 'withholding Evidence' 'forensic Tactics']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Costs Certificate Following Acquittal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a certificate for costs should be granted under Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) following acquittal' 'Whether it would have been reasonable to institute the proceedings if all relevant facts had been known to the prosecution' 'Whether any act or omission by the defendant that contributed to proceedings was reasonable']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the mobile phone footage, which was not made available to the prosecution before proceedings, demonstrated an essential element of the offence could not be proved, it would not have been reasonable to institute proceedings had all facts been known. The applicant's withholding of this evidence was reasonable for tactical reasons.
Court Disposition
Application for a certificate under section 2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) granted.
Orders
- ['Application for a certificate pursuant to section 2, Costs in Criminal Cases Act granted.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment