R v MARSHALL [2010] NSWDC 299
The seriousness of the multiplicity and nature of the child pornography and firearms offences, partially mitigated by early guilty pleas, immediate admissions, genuine remorse, longstanding good character, and mental/physical illness, justify an overall sentence of five years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- The overall sentence is five years' imprisonment with a three year non-parole period.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'child Pornography Offences' 'firearms Offences' 'guilty Plea' 'remorse' 'mitigating Factors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for multiple child pornography and firearms offences' 'Mitigating effect of early guilty plea and mental health' 'Overlap of Commonwealth and State offences']
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the multiplicity and nature of the child pornography and firearms offences, partially mitigated by early guilty pleas, immediate admissions, genuine remorse, longstanding good character, and mental/physical illness, justify an overall sentence of five years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years.
Court Disposition
The overall sentence is five years' imprisonment with a three year non-parole period.
Orders
- ['Counts 5, 6, 8 and 9: fixed term of twelve months imprisonment from 20 October 2010.' 'Count 7: fixed term of eighteen months imprisonment from 20 October 2010.' 'Counts 2 and 3: fixed term of twelve months imprisonment, originally to commence from 20 April 2011, later amended to 20 October 2011.' 'Counts 1 and 4:...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment