Twohill v Mental As Anything Touring Pty Ltd & ors [2008] NSWIRComm 17
The band operated through the corporate entity Mental As Anything Touring Pty Ltd, not through a partnership between the applicant, Murphy and Smith, and the applicant was an employee of Touring. The employment contract was unfair because it contained no adequate provision or protocol requiring reasonable notice, reasons or an opportunity to respond before termination in the unusual circumstances of the band. The respondents failed to prove specific conduct sufficient to justify summary dismissal. Reasonable notice was six months, with credit for four weeks already paid, and Murphy and Smith were personally liable because they were culpably associated with the unfair exclusion of the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 by Amended Summons for Relief / Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; contract of employment varied from inception; respondents jointly and severally ordered to pay compensation; claims for annual leave and long service leave rejected; costs and interest reserved with liberty to apply.
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Contract' 'contract of Employment' 'termination of Employment' 'summary Dismissal' 'reasonable Notice' 'musical Band Corporate Structure' 'partnership Versus Employment' 'culpable Association of Non Contracting Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 by Amended Summons for Relief / Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was an employee of Mental As Anything Touring Pty Ltd or a partner of Murphy and Smith.' "Whether the applicant's contract of employment was an unfair contract under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 because it permitted exclusion from the band without notice, reasons or procedural fairness." 'Whether the respondents justified summary dismissal of the applicant.' 'What notice or payment in lieu was appropriate.' 'Whether Murphy and Smith should be personally liable for monetary compensation.']
Ratio Decidendi
The band operated through the corporate entity Mental As Anything Touring Pty Ltd, not through a partnership between the applicant, Murphy and Smith, and the applicant was an employee of Touring. The employment contract was unfair because it contained no adequate provision or protocol requiring reasonable notice, reasons or an opportunity to respond before termination in the unusual circumstances of the band. The respondents failed to prove specific conduct sufficient to justify summary dismissal. Reasonable notice was six months, with credit for four weeks already paid, and Murphy and Smith were personally liable because they were culpably associated with the unfair exclusion of the...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; contract of employment varied from inception; respondents jointly and severally ordered to pay compensation; claims for annual leave and long service leave rejected; costs and interest reserved with liberty to apply.
Orders
- ['Consequent upon the finding of unfairness, the contract of employment between the applicant and Mental As Anything Touring Pty Limited was varied from its inception to provide that the employer shall not purport to terminate the employment of the applicant without giving reasonable notice or paying moneys in lieu...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment