Gabrieli v R [2023] NSWCCA 204
The aggregate sentence imposed in this case is not manifestly excessive, unreasonable or plainly unjust; the sole ground of appeal is not made out.
- Parties
- Applicant: David Gabrieli; Respondent: Rex (Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Sexual Offences, Manifestly Excessive Sentencing, Aggregate Sentences, Subjective Circumstances in Mitigation, Non Parole Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
David Gabrieli
Applicant
Rex (Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the aggregate sentence of 18 years with a non-parole period of 13 years is manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriateness of indicative sentences for individual counts
- 3 Whether subjective circumstances warranted more leniency
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence imposed in this case is not manifestly excessive, unreasonable or plainly unjust; the sole ground of appeal is not made out.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal
- Dismiss the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment