Moore v Macks [2007] FCA 10
There is no evidentiary basis to impugn the trustee's decision not to prosecute the appeals or seek an extension of time. The trustee properly assessed the merits, costs, risks, and lack of benefit to the estate. There is no reason for the court to interfere under s 178 or order an inquiry under s 179 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The application is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Decision on Application for Orders Against Trustee in Bankruptcy
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ["trustee's Discretion" 'appeal Deemed Abandoned' 'review of Trustee Conduct' 'application for Removal of Trustee']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Decision on Application for Orders Against Trustee in Bankruptcy
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trustee in bankruptcy's decision not to prosecute appeals should be interfered with under s 178 or s 179 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)" 'Whether the trustee may apply under s 33(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for extension of time within which to elect to prosecute appeals after time expired' 'Whether there is any basis for orders for removal of the trustee']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no evidentiary basis to impugn the trustee's decision not to prosecute the appeals or seek an extension of time. The trustee properly assessed the merits, costs, risks, and lack of benefit to the estate. There is no reason for the court to interfere under s 178 or order an inquiry under s 179 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The proceedings transferred to this Court by order of a Federal Magistrate made on 13 June 2006 be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment