David Gilbey v Lyndall Murray [2011] NSWDC 255
Although the defendant breached her duty of care by failing to check for overtaking vehicles before turning, causation was not established because the plaintiff was not there to be seen at the critical moment; thus, the defendant's breach was not a necessary condition of the harm.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Gilbey; Defendant: Lyndall Murray
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tort Negligence / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on an ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Breach of Duty, Causation, Contributory Negligence, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Gilbey
Plaintiff
Lyndall Murray
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Tort Negligence / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was in breach of duty of care to the plaintiff
- 2 Whether any breach caused the collision and resultant harm
- 3 Assessment of contributory negligence
Ratio Decidendi
Although the defendant breached her duty of care by failing to check for overtaking vehicles before turning, causation was not established because the plaintiff was not there to be seen at the critical moment; thus, the defendant's breach was not a necessary condition of the harm.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on an ordinary basis.
Orders
- Verdict and judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff
- Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on an ordinary basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment