R v QIN; QIN v REGINA [2008] NSWCCA 189
The jury's guilty verdicts on counts 1 and 2 and not guilty verdict on count 4 were logically reconcilable given the different quality and certainty of the complainant's evidence on each count. There was a rational basis for such discrimination, and therefore the ground of appeal failed. In relation to sentence, none of the Crown's complaints demonstrated error requiring intervention and the sentences lay within the range of the sentencing judge's discretion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction and Crown Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; Crown appeal against sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['mixed Verdicts' 'uncorroborated Evidence' 'sentencing' 'crown Appeals' 'discretionary Range of Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction and Crown Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the 'mixed' verdicts (guilty on some counts, not guilty on another) were logically reconcilable and reasonable" 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate and involved appealable error']
Ratio Decidendi
The jury's guilty verdicts on counts 1 and 2 and not guilty verdict on count 4 were logically reconcilable given the different quality and certainty of the complainant's evidence on each count. There was a rational basis for such discrimination, and therefore the ground of appeal failed. In relation to sentence, none of the Crown's complaints demonstrated error requiring intervention and the sentences lay within the range of the sentencing judge's discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; Crown appeal against sentence dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed.' 'Crown appeal against sentence dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment