David John Marlin v NSW State Parole Authority [2009] NSWSC 68

David John Marlin v NSW State Parole Authority [2009] NSWSC 68

None of the information relied upon by the applicant and upon which the respondent based its decision was false, misleading or irrelevant. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: David John Marlin; Respondent: NSW State Parole Authority
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 155 Crimes (administration of Sentences) Act 1999 / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Parole, False, Misleading or Irrelevant Information Under S 155
Criminal Law Parole False, Misleading or Irrelevant Information Under S 155

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David John Marlin

Applicant

NSW State Parole Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 155 Crimes (administration of Sentences) Act 1999 / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the information relied upon by the State Parole Authority in refusing parole was false, misleading or irrelevant as alleged by the applicant under s 155 of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999

Ratio Decidendi

None of the information relied upon by the applicant and upon which the respondent based its decision was false, misleading or irrelevant. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.