Sutherland v Woods [2011] NSWSC 13

Sutherland v Woods [2011] NSWSC 13

The Woodsland Super Fund (WSF) was validly established as an express trust by the joint intention, conduct, and documentary execution of David John Sutherland and Shane Leonard Woods, despite the absence of an available signed trust deed and company resolution, as missing documents are presumed executed based on evidence and intention. The WSF is a non-complying superannuation fund under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) and both parties, as trustees, share responsibility for associated liabilities. Properties acquired by the parties, including the Patonga property (before its sale) and 52% interest in the Bay Street, Botany property, were assets of the WSF.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Equity Trusts/superannuation / Principal Judgment, Standing Over for Short Minutes and Further Orders
Outcome
Proceedings stood over for parties to bring short minutes of orders reflecting reasons for judgment; appropriate orders and directions for asset sales and conduct of related proceedings to be made after further hearing.
Legal Topics
['express Trusts' 'superannuation Fund Compliance' 'admissions in Pleadings' 'indemnification of Trustees' 'pleadings and Estoppel']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Trusts/superannuation / Principal Judgment, Standing Over for Short Minutes and Further Orders

  1. 1 ['Whether the WSF (Woodsland Super Fund) was valid and effective as an express trust' 'Whether the WSF was a complying superannuation fund for the purpose of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth)' 'Whether Woodsland Pty Ltd executed necessary resolutions to establish the trust' 'Whether admissions made by a party in one proceeding constitute admissions or estoppel in a related proceeding' 'Whether assets (Patonga property, Bay Street property) were assets of the WSF']

Ratio Decidendi

The Woodsland Super Fund (WSF) was validly established as an express trust by the joint intention, conduct, and documentary execution of David John Sutherland and Shane Leonard Woods, despite the absence of an available signed trust deed and company resolution, as missing documents are presumed executed based on evidence and intention. The WSF is a non-complying superannuation fund under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) and both parties, as trustees, share responsibility for associated liabilities. Properties acquired by the parties, including the Patonga property (before its sale) and 52% interest in the Bay Street, Botany property, were assets of the WSF.

Court Disposition

Proceedings stood over for parties to bring short minutes of orders reflecting reasons for judgment; appropriate orders and directions for asset sales and conduct of related proceedings to be made after further hearing.

Orders

  • []