Milne v Benjafield [1999] NSWSC 253

Milne v Benjafield [1999] NSWSC 253

The court held that mere acquaintance between the proposed receiver and a solicitor for a party does not automatically disqualify the receiver, especially in the context of professional circles where such acquaintance is common. Mr Lombe’s expertise and experience in solicitors’ practice receiverships made his appointment preferable, and no real loss of the appearance of independence was found on these facts.

Parties
Plaintiff: David Keith Gordon Milne; Defendant: Peter Vivian Benjafield
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 March 1999
Procedural Posture
Equity / Application for Appointment of Receiver in Dissolved Partnership
Outcome
Plaintiff's nominee not appointed; defendant's nominee Mr Lombe appointed as receiver.
Legal Topics
Appointment of Receiver, Impartiality of Receivers, Receivership of Solicitors' Practices
Corporations Equity Appointment of Receiver Impartiality of Receivers Receivership of Solicitors' Practices

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Keith Gordon Milne

Plaintiff

Peter Vivian Benjafield

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity / Application for Appointment of Receiver in Dissolved Partnership

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should appoint a receiver proposed by one party when the receiver is professionally acquainted with solicitors for the other party
  2. 2 Whether such acquaintance gives rise to an appearance of partiality or lack of independence sufficient to disqualify the proposed receiver

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that mere acquaintance between the proposed receiver and a solicitor for a party does not automatically disqualify the receiver, especially in the context of professional circles where such acquaintance is common. Mr Lombe’s expertise and experience in solicitors’ practice receiverships made his appointment preferable, and no real loss of the appearance of independence was found on these facts.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's nominee not appointed; defendant's nominee Mr Lombe appointed as receiver.

Orders

  • Mr David John Lombe appointed receiver of the dissolved partnership by consent, with further orders as to disbursement of funds received by the plaintiff and defendant after dissolution. Matter stood over to 10 am the next day.