Morrish v Pertom Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCC 92
The out-of-time medical reports were not an issue because the respondent consented to their tender; the asserted abandonment of an economic loss claim was an incorrect view of the law; and pursuing common law rights would elect the applicant out of the lump-sum compensation actually claimed under s 66 and s 67. The proceeding was struck out for want of prosecution.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation / Application for Adjournment; Foreshadowed Application for Leave to Discontinue If Adjournment Unsuccessful
- Outcome
- Struck out for want of prosecution.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'economic Loss' 'common Law Rights' 'lump Sum Compensation' 'want of Prosecution']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation / Application for Adjournment; Foreshadowed Application for Leave to Discontinue If Adjournment Unsuccessful
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's proceedings should be adjourned." "Whether prosecuting the current compensation claim would abandon the applicant's right to claim economic loss." "Whether pursuing common law rights would affect the applicant's claim for lump-sum compensation under s 66 and s 67."]
Ratio Decidendi
The out-of-time medical reports were not an issue because the respondent consented to their tender; the asserted abandonment of an economic loss claim was an incorrect view of the law; and pursuing common law rights would elect the applicant out of the lump-sum compensation actually claimed under s 66 and s 67. The proceeding was struck out for want of prosecution.
Court Disposition
Struck out for want of prosecution.
Orders
- ['For want of prosecution, struck out.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment