Mahaffy v Mahaffy [2017] NSWCA 199
The adjournment was refused because the appeal was already at an advanced stage, the appellant's principal written and oral submissions had been completed, no basis was shown for supplementing the appeal material with additional documents, the prospect of legal aid was of little significance at that stage, and any inability to attend in person could be addressed by telephone appearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Appeal / Application to Adjourn the Hearing of 15 August 2017, Determined on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'practice and Procedure' 'appeal by Way of Rehearing or Appeal in Its True Sense' 'additional Evidence on Appeal' 'self Represented Litigants']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Contempt Appeal / Application to Adjourn the Hearing of 15 August 2017, Determined on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the further hearing of the appeal fixed for 15 August 2017 should be adjourned for at least 6 weeks.' "Whether the appellant's asserted need for legal representation, possible legal aid, inability to travel, and alleged need for additional documents justified an adjournment."]
Ratio Decidendi
The adjournment was refused because the appeal was already at an advanced stage, the appellant's principal written and oral submissions had been completed, no basis was shown for supplementing the appeal material with additional documents, the prospect of legal aid was of little significance at that stage, and any inability to attend in person could be addressed by telephone appearance.
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment refused.
Orders
- ['Refuse the application to adjourn the hearing of 15 August 2017']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment