Gold, David Marcus v R [2018] NSWCCA 135
No error of principle was shown in the way the sentencing judge took into account the Form 1 offences when sentencing, nor in the judge's discretionary assessment that, despite the applicant's diagnosed conditions, the gravity of the offending justified no reduction in the weight of general deterrence attaching to sentencing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence After Conviction and Sentencing in the District Court
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'possessing Child Abuse Material' 'disseminating Child Abuse Material' 'grooming Child for Unlawful Sexual Activity' 'sentencing Principles' 'mental Condition in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence After Conviction and Sentencing in the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in taking into account offences on the Form 1 in aggravating the objective seriousness of the principal offence' "Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to take into account or afford sufficient weight to the applicant's mental condition at the time of the offences, with respect to moral culpability and general deterrence"]
Ratio Decidendi
No error of principle was shown in the way the sentencing judge took into account the Form 1 offences when sentencing, nor in the judge's discretionary assessment that, despite the applicant's diagnosed conditions, the gravity of the offending justified no reduction in the weight of general deterrence attaching to sentencing.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment