McKay & anor v McKay (Costs) [2008] NSWSC 256
Given that the defendant succeeded on the main contested issue (the cross-claim) and plaintiffs' primary claims failed, but plaintiffs had minor successes and proceeding arose due to the necessary dissolution of a family joint venture, plaintiffs should pay 60% of the defendant's costs, taking into account all proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings—trustees for Sale and Cross Claim / Costs Judgment Following Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs to pay 60% of defendant's costs of the consolidated proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'trustees for Sale' 'conveyancing Act S 66 G' 'partnership Analogies' 'family Property Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings—trustees for Sale and Cross Claim / Costs Judgment Following Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event in s 66G Conveyancing Act 1919 proceedings between family members' 'Appropriate allocation of costs given mixed outcome in proceedings involving failed family joint venture']
Ratio Decidendi
Given that the defendant succeeded on the main contested issue (the cross-claim) and plaintiffs' primary claims failed, but plaintiffs had minor successes and proceeding arose due to the necessary dissolution of a family joint venture, plaintiffs should pay 60% of the defendant's costs, taking into account all proceedings.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs to pay 60% of defendant's costs of the consolidated proceedings.
Orders
- ["Plaintiffs to pay 60% of defendant's costs of the consolidated proceedings, including Local and District Court matters." 'Orders made per Short Minutes initialled by the judge and filed this day.' 'Exhibits to be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment