McPaul v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCC 89

McPaul v BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCC 89

On the balance of probabilities, the applicant's accepted workplace hand and shoulder injuries, together with the evidence of ongoing shoulder restriction and favouring of the dominant right arm, established a secondary chronic soft-tissue neck injury. The applicant had a 10 per cent permanent neck impairment, a 5 per cent permanent loss of efficient use of the left hand, and a 30 per cent permanent loss of efficient use of the left arm at or above the elbow, exceeding the s 67 threshold and entitling him to s 66 compensation and pain and suffering compensation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Claim for Lump Sum Compensation Pursuant to S 66 and S 67 for Workplace Injuries / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Claim allowed; awards made for permanent impairment, pain and suffering, medical expenses and costs.
Legal Topics
['lump Sum Compensation' 'permanent Impairment' 'pain and Suffering' 'causation of Secondary Neck Injury' 'workplace Hand and Shoulder Injuries']
['workers Compensation'] ['lump Sum Compensation' 'permanent Impairment' 'pain and Suffering' 'causation of Secondary Neck Injury' 'workplace Hand and Shoulder Injuries']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Claim for Lump Sum Compensation Pursuant to S 66 and S 67 for Workplace Injuries / Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant injured his left hand, left arm and neck arising out of and in the course of employment with the respondent.' 'If injury was established, what lump sum compensation was appropriate pursuant to s 66.' 'If the s 67 threshold was exceeded, what lump sum compensation was appropriate for pain and suffering.']

Ratio Decidendi

On the balance of probabilities, the applicant's accepted workplace hand and shoulder injuries, together with the evidence of ongoing shoulder restriction and favouring of the dominant right arm, established a secondary chronic soft-tissue neck injury. The applicant had a 10 per cent permanent neck impairment, a 5 per cent permanent loss of efficient use of the left hand, and a 30 per cent permanent loss of efficient use of the left arm at or above the elbow, exceeding the s 67 threshold and entitling him to s 66 compensation and pain and suffering compensation.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed; awards made for permanent impairment, pain and suffering, medical expenses and costs.

Orders

  • ['The respondent pay to the applicant pursuant to s 66 $4,000 for neck impairment.' 'The respondent pay to the applicant pursuant to s 66 $3,250 for left hand loss.' 'The respondent pay to the applicant pursuant to s 66 $22,500 for left arm loss.' 'The respondent pay to the applicant pursuant to s 67 $20,000.' "The...