Cottrell v Wilcox [2002] FCAFC 53; [2002] FCA 232

Cottrell v Wilcox [2002] FCAFC 53; [2002] FCA 232

None of the grounds of appeal were made out; the primary judge exercised discretion properly, and the appeal must be dismissed. The appeal to admit further evidence was rejected on discretionary grounds; the sequestration order stands despite the subsequent setting aside of the Local Court judgment debt because no error was demonstrated in the application of legal principles by the trial judge.

Parties
Appellant: David Mervyn Cottrell; Respondent: John Alfred Wilcox
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sequestration Order, Bankruptcy Notice, Appeal, Further Evidence, Setting Aside Judgment Debt
Bankruptcy Sequestration Order Bankruptcy Notice Appeal Further Evidence Setting Aside Judgment Debt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Mervyn Cottrell

Appellant

John Alfred Wilcox

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to lead further evidence on appeal
  2. 2 Whether the appellant could go behind the judgment debt after the judgment was set aside by the Local Court
  3. 3 Whether the sequestration order should be set aside given the judgment debt was later set aside

Ratio Decidendi

None of the grounds of appeal were made out; the primary judge exercised discretion properly, and the appeal must be dismissed. The appeal to admit further evidence was rejected on discretionary grounds; the sequestration order stands despite the subsequent setting aside of the Local Court judgment debt because no error was demonstrated in the application of legal principles by the trial judge.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed.
  • The respondent's costs be taxed and paid from the estate of the appellant in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).