Bertram v Naudi (Costs) [2024] FCA 1444
Because the respondent made a formal offer of compromise which was not accepted, and subsequently obtained a judgment more favourable than the offer, the respondent is entitled to party/party costs until 11.00am on 3 May 2022 and indemnity costs thereafter in accordance with FCR 25.14(3).
- Parties
- Applicant: David Morton Bertram; Respondent: Robert William Naudi
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the claim and the cross-claim on a party/party basis until 11.00am on 3 May 2022, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Offers of Compromise, Bankruptcy, Civil Dispute Resolution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Morton Bertram
Applicant
Robert William Naudi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis or party/party basis in light of conduct including failure to accept offers of compromise, failure to file a genuine steps statement, and use of court proceedings where internal review was available.
Ratio Decidendi
Because the respondent made a formal offer of compromise which was not accepted, and subsequently obtained a judgment more favourable than the offer, the respondent is entitled to party/party costs until 11.00am on 3 May 2022 and indemnity costs thereafter in accordance with FCR 25.14(3).
Court Disposition
The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the claim and the cross-claim on a party/party basis until 11.00am on 3 May 2022, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the claim and cross-claim on a party/party basis until 11.00am on 3 May 2022, and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment