Neate v Shellharbour City Council [2007] NSWLEC 234
The removal of SOFF would not significantly impact its regional distribution, as the area is small and highly degraded with proposed reinstatement. Flood risk does not warrant refusal because safeguards are incorporated into the proposal and the risk levels are within acceptable societal standards.
- Parties
- Applicant: David Neate; Respondent: Shellharbour City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application granted with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Flooding, Endangered Ecological Community
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Neate
Applicant
Shellharbour City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the development proposal will significantly impact native vegetation and endangered ecological communities
- 2 Whether a Species Impact Statement (SIS) is required
- 3 Whether the site’s flood-prone nature renders it unsuitable for the proposed development
Ratio Decidendi
The removal of SOFF would not significantly impact its regional distribution, as the area is small and highly degraded with proposed reinstatement. Flood risk does not warrant refusal because safeguards are incorporated into the proposal and the risk levels are within acceptable societal standards.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application granted with conditions.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development application to demolish the existing buildings and construct housing for older people and people with a disability containing 49 dwellings on lot 2 DP 213438 and lot 3 DP 786602, known as 118-120 Koona Street, Albion Park Rail is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment