Neate v Woloongong City Council (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 482
As the four expert witnesses reached agreement on substitute deferred commencement conditions and no submissions were made against, the Court found it appropriate to uphold the application and order the removal and substitution of the conditions as agreed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- S96 Modification Application / Judgment on Application to Modify Consent
- Outcome
- Application upheld.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'modification of Development Consent' 'flood Emergency Planning' 'deferred Commencement Conditions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
S96 Modification Application / Judgment on Application to Modify Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the deferred commencement condition for development consent should be removed and replaced with other conditions concerning emergency response to floods']
Ratio Decidendi
As the four expert witnesses reached agreement on substitute deferred commencement conditions and no submissions were made against, the Court found it appropriate to uphold the application and order the removal and substitution of the conditions as agreed.
Court Disposition
Application upheld.
Orders
- ['The application is upheld.' 'The Deferred Commencement Condition of the consent granted on 4 April 2006 is deleted.' 'Four new Deferred Commencement Conditions are substituted as set out in the judgment.' 'An operational condition 150B is inserted requiring completion, testing, and documentation of the Flood...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment