R v David Peter Cain (No.1) [2001] NSWSC 116
Bail was granted subject to strict conditions because, despite the presumption against bail in serious drug matters and the strength of the Crown case, the applicant demonstrated strong community ties, no previous failure to appear, prolonged pre-trial custody, absence of threat to persons or community, and the provision of substantial security in forms of cash and real estate offered by family and associates.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Bail
- Outcome
- Bail granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'presumption Against Bail' 'security Offered for Bail']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether conditional bail should be granted to the applicant given the presumption against bail under s8A of the Bail Act 1978 for serious drug offences']
Ratio Decidendi
Bail was granted subject to strict conditions because, despite the presumption against bail in serious drug matters and the strength of the Crown case, the applicant demonstrated strong community ties, no previous failure to appear, prolonged pre-trial custody, absence of threat to persons or community, and the provision of substantial security in forms of cash and real estate offered by family and associates.
Court Disposition
Bail granted subject to conditions
Orders
- ['The applicant is to reside at 52 Brighton Street, Banksmeadow.' 'The applicant is to report daily to the Botany Police Station.' 'The applicant is not to go within one kilometre of any airport or point of overseas departure except as necessary for police reporting.' 'The applicant is not to associate with any...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment