Fleming v Price [2012] NSWDC 114
The Senior Member appropriately considered all evidence and exercised discretion within statutory powers in dismissing the appeal and awarding indemnity costs against the plaintiffs, as their claims lacked merit, were substantially unsuccessful, and resulted in disproportionate litigation expense relative to the outcome.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Gregory Fleming; Second Plaintiff: Zoe Fleming; Defendant: David Price t/as David Price Building Services
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal From Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal, Costs Orders, Indemnity Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gregory Fleming
First Plaintiff
Zoe Fleming
Second Plaintiff
David Price t/as David Price Building Services
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the findings regarding the defendant's involvement in residential building works constituted errors of law
- 2 Whether costs, including indemnity costs, should be awarded against plaintiffs who had partial success in their claim
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider crucial evidence regarding the defendant's involvement and liability
Ratio Decidendi
The Senior Member appropriately considered all evidence and exercised discretion within statutory powers in dismissing the appeal and awarding indemnity costs against the plaintiffs, as their claims lacked merit, were substantially unsuccessful, and resulted in disproportionate litigation expense relative to the outcome.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Plaintiffs pay defendant's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment