Sarikaya, David v Victorian Workcover Authority [1997] FCA 1372
A post office box is not the address of a place at which a document may be left for a person within the meaning of O 7 r 6(1) of the Federal Court Rules; accordingly, a post office box does not comply as an address for service.
- Parties
- Appellant: David Sarikaya; Respondent: Victorian Workcover Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Address for Service
- Outcome
- Appellant ordered to provide a compliant address for service; appeal to be listed once compliant address provided; liberty to apply reserved; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Address for Service, Federal Court Rules, Service of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Sarikaya
Appellant
Victorian Workcover Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Address for Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a post office box can be an address for service under O 7 r 6(1) of the Federal Court Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
A post office box is not the address of a place at which a document may be left for a person within the meaning of O 7 r 6(1) of the Federal Court Rules; accordingly, a post office box does not comply as an address for service.
Court Disposition
Appellant ordered to provide a compliant address for service; appeal to be listed once compliant address provided; liberty to apply reserved; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The appellant file and serve within 7 days a notice showing an address for service in compliance with O 7 r 6(2) of the Federal Court Rules.
- The appeal be listed for hearing during the sittings of a Full Court in Melbourne to be held in March 1998 on a date to be notified by the Victorian District Registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment