Taylor v Joye [2018] NSWCATAP 309
The Tribunal’s reasoning on s 22 discretion was unclear and inadequately stated all relevant matters; this was an error of law justifying allowing the appeal, but on rehearing, the Panel found that the appellants should not be permitted to serve a notice under s 22, and the application should be dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: David Taylor; Appellant: Rosemary Taylor; Respondent: Ashley Joye
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; application dismissed; extension of time to file Notice of Appeal granted; costs reserved for submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Dividing Fences, Jurisdiction, Appeal – Error of Law, Extension of Time – Out of Time Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Taylor
Appellant
Rosemary Taylor
Appellant
Ashley Joye
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in finding no jurisdiction under s 22 Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW)
- 2 Whether inadequate reasons were given constituting an error of law
- 3 Whether leave should be granted to serve a late notice seeking contribution to fencing work
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal’s reasoning on s 22 discretion was unclear and inadequately stated all relevant matters; this was an error of law justifying allowing the appeal, but on rehearing, the Panel found that the appellants should not be permitted to serve a notice under s 22, and the application should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; application dismissed; extension of time to file Notice of Appeal granted; costs reserved for submissions.
Orders
- Leave to extend the time to file the Notice of Appeal granted.
- Appeal allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment