GSM (Trademarks) Pty Ltd v Shao (No 3) [2006] FCA 1745

GSM (Trademarks) Pty Ltd v Shao (No 3) [2006] FCA 1745

The respondent imported mobile phone covers bearing the registered 'BILLABONG' trade mark without authorisation, infringing trade mark registration 964518; applicants as owner and authorised user were entitled to relief including forfeiture, delivery up, injunction, and fixed costs, having satisfied the requirements for such orders under the Trade Marks Act and Federal Court Rules.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property – Trade Mark Infringement / Final Hearing – Judgment After Contested Proceeding, Respondent Absent
Outcome
Relief granted for applicants, including declaration of infringement, orders for forfeiture, permanent injunction, delivery up of infringing items, and fixed costs against respondent.
Legal Topics
['trade Mark Infringement' 'forfeiture of Infringing Goods' 'service of Process' 'costs' 'injunctions']
['intellectual Property'] ['trade Mark Infringement' 'forfeiture of Infringing Goods' 'service of Process' 'costs' 'injunctions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Intellectual Property – Trade Mark Infringement / Final Hearing – Judgment After Contested Proceeding, Respondent Absent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the respondent infringed the registered trade mark 'BILLABONG' by importing and intending to sell mobile phone covers bearing the mark without authorisation" 'Whether the applicants are entitled to final relief including injunction, forfeiture, delivery up, and fixed costs']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent imported mobile phone covers bearing the registered 'BILLABONG' trade mark without authorisation, infringing trade mark registration 964518; applicants as owner and authorised user were entitled to relief including forfeiture, delivery up, injunction, and fixed costs, having satisfied the requirements for such orders under the Trade Marks Act and Federal Court Rules.

Court Disposition

Relief granted for applicants, including declaration of infringement, orders for forfeiture, permanent injunction, delivery up of infringing items, and fixed costs against respondent.

Orders

  • ['Declaration that respondent infringed registered trade mark 964518 by importing 2,968 mobile phone covers' 'Discharge of previous interlocutory order and undertaking as to damages' 'Permanent injunction restraining respondent from importing, procuring, selling, or authorising such actions in relation to relevant...