Wieckowski v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2016] NSWCATAD 254

Wieckowski v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2016] NSWCATAD 254

Because Mr Wieckowski has never held a tattoo operator's licence and the transitional provisions did not apply to him, the Tribunal has no power to make an order that would effectively grant him a licence pending review.

Parties
Applicant: David Wieckowski; First Respondent: Commissioner for Fair Trading; Second Respondent: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Interlocutory Application for Stay/order Affecting Decision Pending Review
Outcome
Application for stay/refusal order is refused
Legal Topics
Stay Orders, Administrative Review, Tattoo Parlours Licensing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Wieckowski

Applicant

Commissioner for Fair Trading

First Respondent

Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Review / Interlocutory Application for Stay/order Affecting Decision Pending Review

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has power under s 60(2) Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 to make an order staying or otherwise affecting the operation of a refusal to grant a licence

Ratio Decidendi

Because Mr Wieckowski has never held a tattoo operator's licence and the transitional provisions did not apply to him, the Tribunal has no power to make an order that would effectively grant him a licence pending review.

Court Disposition

Application for stay/refusal order is refused

Orders

  • The Applicant's request for an order staying or otherwise affecting the operation of the decision of the Commissioner for Fair Trading to refuse his application for a tattoo operator's licence is refused.