Appeal of David William Ho [2006] NSWDC 72
Although the judge was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant drove the nominated vehicle near Maclean in a manner that menaced Julian Leonard, the appellant's account that he was seeking to avoid an accident created a reasonable doubt about whether he intended to menace; the conviction therefore had to be quashed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal From Conviction in Local Court / District Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; conviction quashed; penalties, fines and court costs quashed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Conviction' 'drive in Manner That Menaced With Intent to Menace' 'elements of Offence' 'intent to Menace' 'reasonable Doubt']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal From Conviction in Local Court / District Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant drove in a manner that menaced Julian Leonard.' 'Whether the appellant drove with the intention of menacing Julian Leonard.' 'Whether the evidence left a reasonable doubt as to intent.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the judge was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant drove the nominated vehicle near Maclean in a manner that menaced Julian Leonard, the appellant's account that he was seeking to avoid an accident created a reasonable doubt about whether he intended to menace; the conviction therefore had to be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; conviction quashed; penalties, fines and court costs quashed.
Orders
- ['The conviction is quashed.' 'The penalties imposed by the learned magistrate are quashed.' 'The period of disqualification imposed by the learned magistrate is quashed.' 'Court costs imposed by the learned magistrate, if any, are quashed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment