Davids Holdings Pty Ltd v Coles Myer Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 18
Coles Myer was not entitled to indemnity costs because the circumstances did not demonstrate special or unusual features such as misconduct, lack of bona fides, or wilful disregard of law. The conduct of both parties was consistent with ordinary contested litigation, Coles Myer did not put Davids on notice it would seek indemnity costs, and prior judgments signalled Davids may have had arguable causes of action. Therefore, party and party costs remained appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Indemnity Costs / Post Discontinuance Motion
- Outcome
- Application for indemnity costs dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'costs Orders' 'discontinuance' 'security for Costs' 'practice and Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Indemnity Costs / Post Discontinuance Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Circumstances in which indemnity costs should be awarded or refused on discontinuance of proceedings' "Whether Davids' conduct justified an award of indemnity costs to Coles Myer"]
Ratio Decidendi
Coles Myer was not entitled to indemnity costs because the circumstances did not demonstrate special or unusual features such as misconduct, lack of bona fides, or wilful disregard of law. The conduct of both parties was consistent with ordinary contested litigation, Coles Myer did not put Davids on notice it would seek indemnity costs, and prior judgments signalled Davids may have had arguable causes of action. Therefore, party and party costs remained appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application for indemnity costs dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application filed by Coles Myer Limited on 22 December, 1993 is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment