DAVIDS HOLDINGS PTY LTD v HUNTINGTON [1988] NSWCA 34
The jury was entitled to adopt a figure for economic loss within a wide range and, on the evidence, a finding of $126,000 for future economic loss was not so excessive as to warrant interference. The appeal must be dismissed as no error of the requisite kind was demonstrated.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Davids Holdings Pty Ltd; Respondent: Huntington
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Appeal / Appeal Against Quantum of Damages
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Quantum, Jury Verdict
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Davids Holdings Pty Ltd
Appellant
Huntington
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Appeal / Appeal Against Quantum of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jury's award of damages was excessive such that no reasonable jury properly instructed could have made such an award.
Ratio Decidendi
The jury was entitled to adopt a figure for economic loss within a wide range and, on the evidence, a finding of $126,000 for future economic loss was not so excessive as to warrant interference. The appeal must be dismissed as no error of the requisite kind was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment