DB Homes Australia Pty Limited v Kes [2019] NSWCATAP 221
No error of law or error warranting leave to appeal was established; factual findings supported that the builder had repudiated the contract and was not entitled to damages or the payment of legal fees as claimed. The Tribunal's findings were thorough and sound, and no substantial miscarriage of justice was shown.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeals' 'repudiation' 'building Contract Termination' 'adequacy of Findings' 'statutory Warranties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Panel Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the builder lawfully terminated the contract' 'Whether oral agreements varied or supplemented the written contract' 'Whether homeowners repudiated the contract' 'Entitlement to damages for breach, rectification, and completion of work' "Entitlement to builder's claims for loss of profits and legal fees"]
Ratio Decidendi
No error of law or error warranting leave to appeal was established; factual findings supported that the builder had repudiated the contract and was not entitled to damages or the payment of legal fees as claimed. The Tribunal's findings were thorough and sound, and no substantial miscarriage of justice was shown.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The stay of Tribunal orders made on 10 April 2019 is lifted immediately.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' 'DB Homes Australia Pty Ltd is to pay Mehtap Kes and Mehmet Kes costs of the proceedings in Matter AP 19/21441 as agreed or assessed under legal costs legislation.' 'If either party seeks to vary the costs order,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment