DBS v Children's Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 62
The Tribunal concluded based on the evidence, including the absence of any harmful conduct in the past decade, improved circumstances, and professional risk assessment, that the applicant does not pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children. Therefore, the refusal of the clearance was not justified, and a clearance should be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Decision set aside, clearance granted
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'clearances' 'risk Assessment' 'child Abuse Allegations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012' "Whether the decision of the Children's Guardian to refuse a Working With Children Check Clearance should be set aside"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal concluded based on the evidence, including the absence of any harmful conduct in the past decade, improved circumstances, and professional risk assessment, that the applicant does not pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children. Therefore, the refusal of the clearance was not justified, and a clearance should be granted.
Court Disposition
Decision set aside, clearance granted
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian of 18 April 2017 refusing the applicant a Working With Children Check Clearance is set aside." 'In substitution for that decision, the following decision is made: The applicant is granted a working with children check clearance.' 'Publication or broadcast without the leave...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment