DC Legal Pty Ltd v Joukhador [2023] NSWSC 804

DC Legal Pty Ltd v Joukhador [2023] NSWSC 804

There had been a material change in circumstances since the earlier order because the plaintiff had filed a complex statement of claim expanding the issues beyond the original summons, including express and implied retainer terms, breach of fiduciary duty and alleged non-compliance with the Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014 (NSW). DC Legal's financial position remained as found by Davies J and no contrary financial evidence was provided. However, security should not provide a complete indemnity, the claimed costs were excessive in areas including discovery and evidence preparation, and ordering a larger sum to the conclusion of the proceedings might stifle the plaintiff's claim. The Court...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Security for Costs Application / Interlocutory Amended Notice of Motion for Additional Security for Costs
Outcome
Application allowed in part; additional security for costs ordered, proceedings stayed until security is provided, and plaintiff ordered to pay the first and third defendants' costs.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'additional Security for Costs' 'corporate Plaintiff Impecuniosity' 'material Change in Circumstances After Prior Interlocutory Order' 'stay of Proceedings Pending Security' 'costs of Motion']
['civil Procedure' 'costs' 'corporations' 'legal Profession'] ['security for Costs' 'additional Security for Costs' 'corporate Plaintiff Impecuniosity' 'material Change in Circumstances After Prior Interlocutory Order' 'stay of Proceedings Pending Security' 'costs of Motion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Security for Costs Application / Interlocutory Amended Notice of Motion for Additional Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the first and third defendants had shown a material change in circumstances since the earlier security for costs order sufficient to justify additional security.' "Whether DC Legal, as a corporate plaintiff, was likely to be unable to pay the defendants' costs if ordered to do so." 'What amount of additional security for costs was appropriate up to the conclusion of the preparation of evidence.' 'Whether the proceedings should be stayed until security was provided.' 'Who should pay the costs of the application.']

Ratio Decidendi

There had been a material change in circumstances since the earlier order because the plaintiff had filed a complex statement of claim expanding the issues beyond the original summons, including express and implied retainer terms, breach of fiduciary duty and alleged non-compliance with the Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014 (NSW). DC Legal's financial position remained as found by Davies J and no contrary financial evidence was provided. However, security should not provide a complete indemnity, the claimed costs were excessive in areas including discovery and evidence preparation, and ordering a larger sum to the conclusion of the proceedings might stifle the plaintiff's claim. The Court...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; additional security for costs ordered, proceedings stayed until security is provided, and plaintiff ordered to pay the first and third defendants' costs.

Orders

  • ['The plaintiff is to provide additional security by payment to the first and third defendants up to the conclusion of the preparation of evidence in the sum of $91,764 within 14 days.' 'The proceedings are to be stayed until security has been provided.' "The plaintiff is to pay the first and third defendant's costs."]