DCD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1262

DCD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1262

The grounds of appeal simply sought to re-agitate factual claims and challenge adverse credibility findings made by the Tribunal and affirmed by the FCC. No jurisdictional error or error of law is established. The FCC correctly concluded that the Tribunal had dealt with the appellant's claims. The appeal fails.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'credibility Assessment' 'merits Review' 'jurisdictional Error']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law' 'human Rights'] ['protection Visa' 'credibility Assessment' 'merits Review' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal and FCC failed to properly consider the appellant’s claims for a protection visa' 'Whether errors were made in credibility findings about alleged persecution and attacks' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court judge erred in rejecting the grounds of review']

Ratio Decidendi

The grounds of appeal simply sought to re-agitate factual claims and challenge adverse credibility findings made by the Tribunal and affirmed by the FCC. No jurisdictional error or error of law is established. The FCC correctly concluded that the Tribunal had dealt with the appellant's claims. The appeal fails.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]