DCP Developments Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1325
The Court made orders by consent under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, disposing of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Consent
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by consent; development application approved with conditions by agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'section 34 Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should make orders by consent under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 following agreement between parties']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court made orders by consent under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, disposing of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by consent; development application approved with conditions by agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ["The applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application DA 2015/00484 in accordance with the plans and documentation set out in condition 3 of the conditions annexed at 'A' to this agreement." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Development Application DA 2015/00484 for the demolition of existing improvements and the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment