DCW19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 675
The applicant's grounds of appeal were expressed generally, lacked particularisation and evidentiary support, and did not demonstrate any arguable case or error in the primary judge's exercise of discretion. Consequently, there was no merit warranting extension of time or leave to appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether grounds for extension of time and leave to appeal exist' 'Whether Tribunal or primary judge failed to properly consider claims or provided procedural fairness' 'Whether sufficient doubt as to correctness of judgment below exists']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's grounds of appeal were expressed generally, lacked particularisation and evidentiary support, and did not demonstrate any arguable case or error in the primary judge's exercise of discretion. Consequently, there was no merit warranting extension of time or leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The name of the first respondent is changed to Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs.' 'The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment