R v Hawkins [2000] NSWCCA 380
Leave to appeal was refused because no sentencing error was shown in the relationship between the minimum and additional terms, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive having regard to the catastrophic result, severe speed, blood alcohol concentration well over four times the minimum permitted, erratic driving, the applicant's criminal record, and the limited utility of the guilty plea.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Severity Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death' 'manifest Excess' 'minimum and Additional Terms' 'alcohol Problem' 'general Deterrence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Severity Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in fixing the relationship between the minimum term and the additional term.' 'Whether the sentence for aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death was manifestly excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because no sentencing error was shown in the relationship between the minimum and additional terms, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive having regard to the catastrophic result, severe speed, blood alcohol concentration well over four times the minimum permitted, erratic driving, the applicant's criminal record, and the limited utility of the guilty plea.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- ['Application dismissed' 'Leave to appeal refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment