Culina v Timilty Constructions PL [2022] NSWCATCD 109
Money order is appropriate due to severe relational breakdown and lack of confidence in builder's remediation abilities; owner's expert evidence on defects and cost of remedial works accepted as proved, requiring the respondent to pay $61,012.08 for rectification.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Building Defects Claim / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Money order in applicant's favour; costs reserved for further application and submissions.
- Legal Topics
- ['home Building—statutory Warranties' 'defective Work' 'work Orders Vs. Money Orders' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Building Defects Claim / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent builder is liable for defective waterproofing and drainage work under statutory warranties' 'Whether a work order or money order is appropriate given relational breakdown' 'How damages for defective work should be quantified']
Ratio Decidendi
Money order is appropriate due to severe relational breakdown and lack of confidence in builder's remediation abilities; owner's expert evidence on defects and cost of remedial works accepted as proved, requiring the respondent to pay $61,012.08 for rectification.
Court Disposition
Money order in applicant's favour; costs reserved for further application and submissions.
Orders
- ['Order that the respondent Timilty Constructions PL pay Dean Culina $61,012.08 on or before 21 July 2022.' 'Any party wishing to seek an order for costs is to file and serve application and submissions on or before 7 July 2022.' 'Any submissions in response are to be filed and served on or before 21 July 2022.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment