McCarry v Curtis [2023] NSWCATCD 182
The Tribunal found the tenants liable for $616.00 for gardening as the garden was not returned in the same condition. Claims for flooring and painting were dismissed as the evidence showed the marks and scratches amounted only to fair wear and tear.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Tenancy Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Orders made partly in favour of the landlord: tenants to pay $616.00 for gardening; other claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['rental Bond' 'end of Tenancy' 'compensation' 'fair Wear and Tear']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tenancy Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether tenants returned the premises in the required condition under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010.' 'Whether tenants are liable for gardening, flooring, and painting costs claimed by the landlord.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found the tenants liable for $616.00 for gardening as the garden was not returned in the same condition. Claims for flooring and painting were dismissed as the evidence showed the marks and scratches amounted only to fair wear and tear.
Court Disposition
Orders made partly in favour of the landlord: tenants to pay $616.00 for gardening; other claims dismissed.
Orders
- ['The tenants, Cassandra Curtis and Mark Curtis, are to pay the landlord, Dean McCarry and Leeann Keech and Victoria McCarry the sum of $616.00 immediately.' 'The Rental Bond Services is directed to pay the landlord Dean McCarry and Leeann Keech and Victoria McCarry the sum of $616.00 from rental bond number...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment