Sydney Sunny Glass Pty Ltd v McParland [2020] FCA 1017
Sunny Glass did not assume the obligation to transfer shares under the collateral share contract on taking over as employer; the 'current entitlements' at the transition comprised salary, superannuation, and car allowance as actually paid, not the side share arrangement. The joint and several liability order for share delivery was set aside. Sunny Glass and Mr Chi were liable for adverse action against Mr McParland for exercising a workplace right under the Fair Work Act and for failure to pay the car allowance, with penalties adjusted to fit only the proven contraventions and their seriousness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Cross-appeal allowed in part. Orders of the Federal Circuit Court varied.
- Legal Topics
- ['contractual Interpretation' 'employment Entitlements' 'adverse Action' 'civil Penalties' 'termination of Employment' 'collateral Contracts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the second employer (Sunny Glass) assumed obligations under a collateral share contract made with the first employer (Nuline) to deliver shares to the employee.' "Determining the proper construction of 'current entitlements' in the employment transition between Nuline and Sunny Glass." 'Assessment of liability for adverse action and breaches of the Fair Work Act on termination of employment.']
Ratio Decidendi
Sunny Glass did not assume the obligation to transfer shares under the collateral share contract on taking over as employer; the 'current entitlements' at the transition comprised salary, superannuation, and car allowance as actually paid, not the side share arrangement. The joint and several liability order for share delivery was set aside. Sunny Glass and Mr Chi were liable for adverse action against Mr McParland for exercising a workplace right under the Fair Work Act and for failure to pay the car allowance, with penalties adjusted to fit only the proven contraventions and their seriousness.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Cross-appeal allowed in part. Orders of the Federal Circuit Court varied.
Orders
- ['The appeal be allowed.' 'The cross-appeal be allowed in part.' "The orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia on 13 June 2019 be varied by: (a) deleting 'and the Third Respondent are jointly and severally liable to' from order 1; (b) setting aside orders 2, 3, 5 and 6; and (c) adding the following...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment