Dean Shrimpton v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1319
The Court upheld the appeal and made orders reflecting the agreement reached between the parties at a conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, including upholding Clause 4.6 variation requests, granting consent to the development, and ordering costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; consent granted to the development application; Clause 4.6 variations upheld; costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'clause 4.6 Variation' 'costs' 'land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties have reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 regarding the development application' 'Whether the court should make orders disposing of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement' 'Whether to uphold Clause 4.6 variation requests in respect of height and lot size' 'Whether to grant consent to the development application']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal and made orders reflecting the agreement reached between the parties at a conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, including upholding Clause 4.6 variation requests, granting consent to the development, and ordering costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; consent granted to the development application; Clause 4.6 variations upheld; costs ordered.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of the Conditions of Consent contained in 'Annexure A'." "The Applicant's Clause 4.6 variation request in respect of height is upheld." "The Applicant's Clause 4.6 variation request in respect of lot size is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment