DPP v Bolder [2009] NSWLC 25
The combination of the offender’s pursuit, the use of a weapon, and the significant injuries mean the offence is at the middle range of objective seriousness and warrants a custodial sentence. However, the offender’s guilty plea, previous good character, cognitive impairment, and the exceptional hardship to his mother justify a sentence of 18 months imprisonment to be served by way of periodic detention.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Defendant: Dean Troy Bolder
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Reckless Wounding, Sentencing, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Discount for Guilty Plea, Periodic Detention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Dean Troy Bolder
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for reckless wounding under s 35(4) of the Crimes Act 1900?
- 2 Do aggravating and mitigating circumstances alter the sentencing outcome?
- 3 Does the offender's guilty plea entitle him to a sentencing discount?
Ratio Decidendi
The combination of the offender’s pursuit, the use of a weapon, and the significant injuries mean the offence is at the middle range of objective seriousness and warrants a custodial sentence. However, the offender’s guilty plea, previous good character, cognitive impairment, and the exceptional hardship to his mother justify a sentence of 18 months imprisonment to be served by way of periodic detention.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence imposed
Orders
- The offender is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 18 months to be served by way of periodic detention.
- The sentence is to consist of a minimum period of 12 months with an additional period of 6 months on parole.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment