Large v Mowbray [2012] NSWSC 767
Over a relationship of more than 26 years the parties in substance made equal financial, non-financial, homemaker and parenting contributions to the accumulation of the principal asset. Daryl's inheritances were one-off contributions but were used for the parties' joint benefit and their significance was reduced by the length and nature of the relationship. There was insufficient evidence that Daryl had made a premature distribution of joint assets to himself. The just and equitable adjustment required allowance for Deanne's ongoing primary care of the children, her decision during the relationship to leave business and devote herself to childcare, her likely reduced earning prospects,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for a Property Adjustment Order Pursuant to S 20 of the Property (relationships) Act 1984 / Principal Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing; Short Minutes and Costs Stood Over
- Outcome
- The money in the controlled account was to be divided 60 per cent to the plaintiff and 40 per cent to the defendant, with the matter stood over for short minutes and submissions as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjustment of Property Interests' 'domestic Relationship' 'de Facto Relationship' 'financial and Non Financial Contributions' 'homemaker and Parenting Contributions' 'inheritance' 'superannuation Entitlements' 'add Backs' 'leave to Commence Out of Time']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for a Property Adjustment Order Pursuant to S 20 of the Property (relationships) Act 1984 / Principal Ex Tempore Judgment After Hearing; Short Minutes and Costs Stood Over
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under s 18(2) of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 to bring the proceedings outside the two-year period.' 'What property and liabilities of the parties should be identified and valued for the purposes of s 20 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984.' 'Whether post-separation expenditure by Daryl should be added back or treated as a premature distribution of assets.' "How the parties' respective financial, non-financial, homemaker and parenting contributions, including inheritances and superannuation, should be assessed." 'What order adjusting interests in the controlled money account was just and equitable.']
Ratio Decidendi
Over a relationship of more than 26 years the parties in substance made equal financial, non-financial, homemaker and parenting contributions to the accumulation of the principal asset. Daryl's inheritances were one-off contributions but were used for the parties' joint benefit and their significance was reduced by the length and nature of the relationship. There was insufficient evidence that Daryl had made a premature distribution of joint assets to himself. The just and equitable adjustment required allowance for Deanne's ongoing primary care of the children, her decision during the relationship to leave business and devote herself to childcare, her likely reduced earning prospects,...
Court Disposition
The money in the controlled account was to be divided 60 per cent to the plaintiff and 40 per cent to the defendant, with the matter stood over for short minutes and submissions as to costs.
Orders
- ['Leave to bring the proceedings pursuant to s 18(2) of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 was to be granted.' 'From the funds in the controlled money account there should first be paid to Kieran Mowbray her entitlement, no less than $27,677.70.' 'The money in the controlled account should be divided 60 per cent...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment