Bodger v Goh [2021] NSWCATAP 59
The Member failed to provide adequate reasons or factual foundation for the calculation of compensation, including an error in his characterisation of the area affected by water damage; this omission constitutes an error of law justifying the appeal being allowed and the orders being quashed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; orders quashed; matter remitted for rehearing before different Member; respondent to pay $13,525 to Registrar to be held pending further hearing outcome.
- Legal Topics
- ['adequacy of Reasons' 'quantum of Compensation' 'abatement of Rent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal Member gave adequate reasons for the decision and calculation of compensation' 'Whether the proportion of the premises affected by water damage was properly assessed']
Ratio Decidendi
The Member failed to provide adequate reasons or factual foundation for the calculation of compensation, including an error in his characterisation of the area affected by water damage; this omission constitutes an error of law justifying the appeal being allowed and the orders being quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; orders quashed; matter remitted for rehearing before different Member; respondent to pay $13,525 to Registrar to be held pending further hearing outcome.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed' 'The orders made by the Tribunal on 7 December 2020 are quashed' 'The matter is remitted to the Tribunal for hearing before a different Member upon the basis of such evidence as the Member in his or her discretion shall permit to be adduced' 'The respondent Louis Goh is directed to pay the sum of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment