GIUSTI v TAYLOR [1998] NSWCA 99
It was open to the trial judge to find that no economic loss was suffered by the appellant; the damages awarded for the identified period of negligence (March to August 1994) were within a proper discretionary range; no exceptional circumstances justified a departure from the usual costs order after the offer of compromise.
- Parties
- Appellant: Deborah Giusti; Respondent: Andrew Taylor
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part (to add interest only); otherwise dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Economic Loss, Costs, Offer of Compromise
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deborah Giusti
Appellant
Andrew Taylor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in not awarding economic loss to the appellant
- 2 Whether the award of damages for pain and suffering was manifestly inadequate
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in limiting the period of negligence
Ratio Decidendi
It was open to the trial judge to find that no economic loss was suffered by the appellant; the damages awarded for the identified period of negligence (March to August 1994) were within a proper discretionary range; no exceptional circumstances justified a departure from the usual costs order after the offer of compromise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part (to add interest only); otherwise dismissed
Orders
- Set aside judgment and verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $10,380 and substitute a judgment and verdict for $11,034
- Otherwise confirm the orders made by Judge Shadbolt
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment