Bird v Bird [2013] NSWCA 262

Bird v Bird [2013] NSWCA 262

The Court held that the Barnes v Addy claim failed as Deborah did not prove Warrick and Rodney had actual knowledge of Mona's lack of authority and her payment of sale proceeds into her own account. However, the devastavit claim succeeded: the executors should have identified the misappropriation and taken steps to recover the proceeds. Deborah suffered loss, quantifiable as one-third of the net recoverable sum, less payments already received. The claim was within limitation, as time ran from when action against Mona was statute-barred, not from the first possible breach.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; judgment entered for Deborah Bird on devastavit claim, Barnes v Addy claim dismissed; cross-claims remitted for determination.
Legal Topics
['executors and Administrators' 'devastavit' 'breach of Trust' 'knowing Receipt' 'barnes V Addy' 'liability for Failing to Recover Estate Assets' 'limitation Periods']
['succession' 'equity' 'civil Procedure' 'limitation of Actions'] ['executors and Administrators' 'devastavit' 'breach of Trust' 'knowing Receipt' 'barnes V Addy' 'liability for Failing to Recover Estate Assets' 'limitation Periods']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Warrick and Rodney Bird were liable under the first limb of Barnes v Addy for knowing receipt of misappropriated trust property' 'Whether the executors breached their duties (committed devastavit) in failing to call in and collect estate assets, and are liable for resulting loss' 'Whether the devastavit claim is statute-barred under Limitation Act 1969']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the Barnes v Addy claim failed as Deborah did not prove Warrick and Rodney had actual knowledge of Mona's lack of authority and her payment of sale proceeds into her own account. However, the devastavit claim succeeded: the executors should have identified the misappropriation and taken steps to recover the proceeds. Deborah suffered loss, quantifiable as one-third of the net recoverable sum, less payments already received. The claim was within limitation, as time ran from when action against Mona was statute-barred, not from the first possible breach.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; judgment entered for Deborah Bird on devastavit claim, Barnes v Addy claim dismissed; cross-claims remitted for determination.

Orders

  • ['(1) Allow the appeal in part.' '(2) Set aside orders (1), (3) and (4) made on 5 June 2012 and orders (1) to (4) made on 27 June 2012.' '(3) Judgment for Deborah Bird against Warrick Bird, Rodney Bird and Herbert Cannington in the sum of $188,920.25 plus interest to be calculated.' "(4) Order Warrick Bird, Rodney...